Mobile Version: mobile.timesrepublican.com
RSS:
Marshalltown Weather Forecast, IA
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
News  Obituaries  Money & Markets  Closings and Delays  Sports  Web Exclusives  Jobs  Local Classifieds  CU Galleries
Today's News

Is there a legislative solution to bring back the Alliant plant?

By KEN BLACK, TIMES-REPUBLICAN
POSTED: March 8, 2009

Despite the very bleak outlook concerning the Alliant Energy power plant in Marshalltown, some legislators maintain the plant is still worth fighting for.

"There is something we can do legislatively," said Rep. Annette Sweeney, R-Alden, to a group of Marshall County Republicans Friday. "We can bring in the utilities board because they are governed by the Legislature."

Alliant Energy officials announced last week they would not be building a proposed $1.8 billion power plant in Marshalltown after recent decisions from the Iowa Utilities Board and Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

Rep. Mark Smith, D-Marshalltown, said he agrees there are some things the legislature can do to ensure this situation, which happened to Marshalltown, never happens again. He and Sen. Steve Sodders, D-State Center, met with Alliant Energy CEO Tom Aller and other legislative leaders Thursday morning to delve into what went wrong at the state level.

"One of the things we are interested in looking at is seeing if the whole process can be and should be updated," Smith said.

Sodders believes the Iowa Utilities Board may have been looking too hard at some specific points and not hard enough at others. The senator said there is legislation on the books, which was passed several years ago, which should make it easier to construct power plants in Iowa, not harder.

"Whether we like it or not, the IUB may not have really looked into that law like they should have," he said.

Sodders also had harsh words for Iowa Department of Natural Resources Director Rich Leopold. In previous meetings, Sodders said Leopold assured both himself and Smith the air permit hearing and commenting process would not exceed 30 days unless there was substantial new information presented above and beyond what was already known.

"We were told it would be 30 days, with a couple meetings in Marshalltown and Tama," Sodders said. "As it turns out, the process was extended before we even got to those hearings. I'm not happy with the way Director Leopold handled this."

However, Leopold said Friday that is not what he was trying to convey at a meeting he had with Sodders and Smith. Rather, he believes two issues were getting confused - one about substantial new information which would require certain information from Alliant Energy, and the other issue being the process itself.

"I let them know, depending on public comment, other things could happen," he said. "We had a high level of interest in this and decided to extend the comment period. That's not atypical."

In fact, Leopold said there were more than 700 requests for extending the comment period and holding additional meetings. Many of those requests, the director said, were generated through letter-writing campaigns waged by in-state environmental groups. While out-of-state groups also may have played a role, their comments do not carry nearly as much weight as those constituencies located in Iowa, Leopold said.

Whether or not any of this can be changed at this point is still unknown. Any bill not out of committee by the end of this week will have to wait until next year, making it almost impossible to get legislative action this year through the normal framework.

However, Smith said leadership in both the House and the Senate can bring up bills at any point during the session for discussion. That is one possibility, he stated.

Smith was asked if, even with legislative action, Marshalltown's opportunity for a coal plant was gone.

"My guess is yes," he said. "Unfortunately it is too late. The decisions have been made under the current system."

Sodders also agreed with that assessment.

"You always have that hope that maybe we can do something. We did ask Tom [Aller] if there was anything the Legislature could do right now to help reverse that decision," Sodders said. "Quite frankly, I didn't get the impression there was."

---

Contact Ken Black at 641-753-6611 or kblack@timesrepublican.com

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-12 | Post a comment
JJBean
03-10-09 12:07 AM
"The blog comments on many of the articles posted on here reveal citizens with closed minds and small town meaness."

then OpenMindedGuy says "M'town has "failure" written all over it. I was back visiting at Christmas and all I can say it, "Last one out, turn the lights off!" Good thinking, Alliant! Bravo!!"

telling people how mean they are and then hoping the town fails says alot about this hypocrite's character

BillyJim
03-09-09 4:40 PM
Yeah we're glad your gone too

OpenMindedGuy
03-09-09 4:32 PM
I lived in Marshalltown for 18 years. This qualifies me to say that I don't blame Alliant for wanting to leave M'town, especially because of the type of people that live here. The blog comments on many of the articles posted on here reveal citizens with closed minds and small town meaness. Thank god I escaped M'town with my life. I think its a hoot that other towns half the size of M'town are thriving and growing, but M'town has "failure" written all over it. I was back visiting at Christmas and all I can say it, "Last one out, turn the lights off!" Good thinking, Alliant! Bravo!!

MTownResident
03-09-09 8:40 AM
Maybe people will realize that who they elect into policy making positions actually has consequences. Smith and Sodders have no credibility with their rhetoric over the last couple of years.

AverageAmerican
03-08-09 11:58 PM
Sodders and Smith met with Alliant Energy CEO Tom Aller... "to ensure this situation, which happened to Marshalltown, never happens again" ???? Baloney!!!!

They went to shake Aller/Alliant down for money.

Annette Sweeney has the right idea---bring the crooked Culver crony Dems on the utilitiy board in for a grilling under oath. Go Girl!!!

herkeye
03-08-09 12:31 PM
I don't think Alliant would build it now....regardless of what happens. I think they would hold off based on the current state of the ecomony....just like many other companies are doing nationwide. They want to wait and see what is going to "change". O.B.A.M.A.----One Big Ass Mistake America

SammyCy
03-08-09 12:25 PM
Its never too late..whether it works or not our legislators should be in there doing everything they can...NOW They appointed the IUB flunkies..An opportunity like this will never come Iowas way again. DO SOMETHING

BillyJim
03-08-09 10:36 AM
Go to our view(letter to the editor)and read Don Crowleys comments about Sodder and Smith that was posted on 3-5, the day the announcement was made. He had these two already figured out. Blame for losing this is at there door step and they should pay for it during the next election. Neither has any credability.

sonice
03-08-09 10:09 AM
I have never seen a darker day for Marshalltown. The negative impact from this will ripple thought the community like a death spiral. The power plant was the one wild card to take us up a knotch so we could really make some improvements for our families who are predominately poor, improve our economy by building a larger business and tax base, and improve our ability to keep taxes down to better market our fair city. We have lost so much the past decade when the economy was much better. How much more will we lose now the economy is bad. It is obvious people who have better jobs in town and can afford more decisions in life no longer want to live here. Many drive here from Ankeny, Ames etc. but won't build a life here. We don't have what it takes while others do. We have lost jobs, development, retail, restaurants, etc. while other towns 1/2 our size grow and thrive. Last person out turn off the lights! Oh that's right - We won't have electricity anyway so forget that thought

MtownGuy
03-08-09 10:04 AM
It looks like our local legislators want it both ways - following the Democratic/Earth Friendly/Enviro-nutty line of the Sierra Club, but then backpedaling and showing "concern" when a local project in their district is in jeopardy. Why can't they just be honest and say "I am glad the project failed because my earth-friendly party wanted it to fail."

sonice
03-08-09 10:03 AM
Agreed on your question BillyJim - right on.

Let's get behind a nuclear plant large enough to replace electricity for the coal plants that have been blocked in Wisconsin, Waterloo, and Marshalltown.

Let's Make Marshalltown an assett to Iowa for electricity, clean water for development, and technology. All that equals JOBS! Come on Emerson, give us a hand here!

BillyJim
03-08-09 9:27 AM
Incredible. If Smith and Sodders were so concerned about this, where were they during the process? All they are doing now is covering their political butts. If they had a means to make this happen they should have used it long ago not tell us, "gee we'd like to do something, but i guess it's too late."

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
News  Obituaries  Money & Markets  Closings and Delays  Sports  Web Exclusives  Jobs  Local Classifieds  CU Galleries